The Taiwan status question


Dr. Roger C. S. Lin et. al. v. United States of America



Dr Roger C. S. Lin has a Ph.D. in international law from Meijo University, Nagoya, Japan. Over the past few years he and Richard have been actively researching the international legal status of Taiwan, and have reached some surprising conclusions. Beginning in the summer of 2006, Dr. Lin collected monetary donations throughout Taiwan to pay for hundreds of hours of legal research in Washington, D.C. to confirm their research findings.

The conclusion reached by the Washington D.C. legal counsel can be stated in one sentence: Taiwan is "occupied territory of the United States of America."

Based on these findings, the ROC is best described as "a government in exile." In other words, the ROC has "effective territorial control" over the areas of Formosa and the Pescadores, but not sovereignty.

The fact that the ROC does not have sovereignty over the areas of Formosa and the Pescadores can be easily confirmed by considering the following well known facts --
  • When the ROC was founded in 1912, Taiwan was part of Japan.
  • According to the Article 4 of the ROC Constitution, there has to be a resolution of the National Assembly in order to change the national boundaries.
  • In regard to the supposed incorporation of Taiwan into ROC territory after WWII, there is no resolution of the National Assembly on record.
  • In the San Francisco Peace Treaty of April 1952, Japan renounced all right, title, and claim to Formosa and the Pescadores. However, no receiving country was named for this territorial cession.
  • In regard to the disposition of Taiwan, the Sino-Japanese Peace Treaty of August 1952 reconfirmed the terms of the San Francisco Peace Treaty.
Hence, whether under international law or ROC law, Taiwan is not ROC territory. Native Taiwanese persons are not correctly classified as "ROC citizens." Moreover, the ROC Constitution is not the "organic law" of the Taiwan cession.

With the coming into force of the San Francisco Peace Treaty (SFPT), Taiwan has remained under the jurisdiction of the principal occupying power as an interim status condition. In slightly more technical terminology, this means that United States Military Government (USMG) jurisdiction over Taiwan is still active.

If you think about it, it makes sense. Consider the following --

Most importantly, what do these research findings mean to the
Taiwanese people? Well, first we must point out that a "clarification of the status quo is not a change to the status quo." With the recognition that USMG jurisdiction over Taiwan is still active, we can move forward to achieve the following objectives under US administrative authority --
  • Passports for native Taiwanese persons to be issued by the Dept. of State (As stated above, native Taiwanese persons are not correctly classified as ROC citizens. Under US law, the default nationality for native persons in conquered territory after peace treaty cession, and without any action by the Congress, is US national non-citizen)
  • Recognition as the sixth major US overseas territory (after Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, American Virgin Islands, and the Northern Mariana Islands)
  • Visa free travel to the USA
  • Improved economic relations with the USA, equivalent to (or surpassing) the much sought for "Free Trade Agreement"
  • Name rectification as Taiwan
  • A new Taiwan constitution
  • A new Taiwan flag and new Taiwan seal
  • Improvement in consumer rights across the board
  • Improved Taiwanese agricultural policies
  • Improved protections against unscrupulous real estate companies
  • Entrance into the World Health Organization as an associate member under the USA
  • More efficient administration of the National Health Insurance system
  • Continuance of membership in the World Trade Organization as a separate customs territory
  • No liability for US federal income taxes by Taiwanese persons, US citizens, or foreigners in Taiwan (ditto for "juridicial persons")
  • Improvement and streamlining of the Taiwan tax structure
  • "National defense" responsibilities for Taiwan handled directly by the Pentagon
  • End of military conscription in the Taiwan area
  • Dismantling of the 850 missiles which the PRC has pointed at Taiwan
  • Improved law enforcement against illegal smuggling and immigration from the PRC
  • Improved human rights protections for all workers
  • Reorganization of the Taiwan court system under the US model, while maintaining the strengths of the current system
  • Reorganization of the Taiwan educational system under the US model, while maintaining the strengths of the current system
  • Expanded use of the English language in Taiwanese schools, society, and in the government bureaucracy
  • Reorganization and retraining of the Taiwanese police force
  • Implementation of the "Three Links" at an early date
  • Full establishment of Taiwan as an Asian Pacific Regional Operations Center, with a resulting infusion of much new foreign investment

As for
US citizens and foreigners in Taiwan, the WISHLIST for legal rights in Taiwan on the forumosa.com/taiwan/ website is a very interesting thread, and it certainly seems most likely that 95% of the items listed in there which are suitable to Taiwan's status under US jurisdiction can be achieved.

See WISHLIST for legal rights in Taiwan

For those who are somewhat confused by how the recognition of direct military occupation by the US will affect the lives of other persons in Taiwan, it may be stated that for 95% of the "expatriates" there will be little change in the normal run of daily activities.

In terms of the functioning of the Taiwan government, there is an organization chart for the new government structure which you can download and examine at your leisure. Please see the very bottom of this webpage.




Resolving the Political Status of Taiwan
through the US Court system



Technically speaking, it is not possible to deal with "political issues" through the judiciary. However, the courts can look at civil rights issues, and once these are carefully delineated, it may be much easier to understand the parameters of all related political questions.

In order to obtain better civil rights protections for the Taiwanese people, we need to determine the true status of Taiwan under international law. The United States, and indeed many world nations, have traditionally maintained a policy of strategic ambiguity on this issue, however we can discover the true facts of the matter by looking at the historical and legal record.

Taiwan, including the Pescadores, was ceded by China (then under the Qing Dynasty) to Japan in 1895. With regard to the beginning of the Pacific war in December 1941, and the conduct of the war, the following facts are important:
  • Contrary to the claims of some historians, Taiwan was not part of the China Theatre during the war.
  • All military attacks against Taiwan during the war were conducted by United States military forces.
  • Taiwan was de jure part of Japanese territory up until late April 1952.
After the events of August 1945, the Japanese Emperor announced his acceptance of the terms of an unconditional surrender. Japanese troops in Taiwan surrendered on Oct. 25, 1945, thus marking the beginning of the belligerent occupation of "Formosa and the Pescadores." Although the surrender ceremonies in Taiwan were held on behalf of the Allies, the ensuing military occupation on Taiwan was conducted on behalf of the "conqueror" and "principal occupying power" -- the United States of America.

After losing the Chinese civil war in 1949, the ROC government fled in exile to Taiwan, an area it was holding under military occupation on behalf of the principal occupying power. The People's Republic of China (PRC) was established on the mainland on October 1, 1949, and hence became the legal successor government to the ROC in the mainland areas.

In the April 28, 1952, San Francisco Peace Treaty, Japan renounced all right, title, and claim to Formosa and the Pescadores. However, no receiving country was named for this territorial cession. Hence, Taiwan has remained under the jurisdiction of the principal occupying power as an interim status condition.

Based on this simple legal and historical analysis, and with reference to the decisions in the Insular Cases of the US Supreme Court, the Taiwanese people, by virtue of living in a territory subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, should be entitled to fundamental rights under US laws, including the US Constitution. It should therefore be possible to file a Complaint for Declaratory Relief in the appropriate US Court to obtain these rights.

In this way, the controversy regarding the political status of Taiwan can be resolved as well.

A Complaint was filed in late October 2006. The United States government has until late mid-January 2007 to reply. Full details on the content of this Complaint, along with relevant historical and legal background information, are given below.







UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF

   filed Oct. 24, 2006, in Washington, D.C.







Summary: Complaint for Declaratory Relief (.htm)



COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF (.pdf)






BACKGROUND INFORMATION



1. The One China Policy and Taiwan's Identity Crisis


2. ABCD Chart   of territorial cession


3. The Territorial Cessions of Puerto Rico, the Philippines, Guam, Cuba, & Taiwan


4. Are Taiwanese Persons ROC Citizens? -- In Search of a Legal Basis for ROC Citizenship


5. Background Information and Statement of Purpose


6. Letters and Commentary


7. Taiwanese should seek US Constitutional rights


8. Statement of Historical and Legal Evidence for US Nationality Status provided in accompaniment with Application for US nationality non-citizen PASSPORT by native Taiwanese person born in Taiwan


9. US Insular Law Considerations on the Origin and Classification of "Aliens"


10. Understanding the San Francisco Peace Treaty's Disposition of Formosa and the Pescadores (pdf)   Harvard Asia Quarterly, Fall 2004


11. Three Insular Cases and the Taiwan status


12. Important Quotations from Downes v. Bidwell


13. On the Subjects of "Conquest" and "Dominion"


14. Unincorporated Territory under the United States Military Government


15. The Law of Occupation   Background Information


16. FM 27-10  The Law of Land Warfare    Chapter 6: OCCUPATION   para. 366


17. Territorial Cession after War and the End of Military Government


18. Our inquiry to the US government -- What are you doing?


19. Does Taiwan Meet the Criteria to Qualify as an "Overseas Territory of the United States"?


20. Why Isn't the US Flag Flying Over Taiwan?


21. A new recognition of the United States of America





Taiwan Nation Party
Taipei, Taiwan
and
Taiwan Defense Alliance
Taichung, Taiwan




For more information, contact:
Chinese & Japanese language spokesperson:
Dr. Roger C. S. Lin
Gaoxiong, Taiwan

Roger C. S. Lin's Chinese website


English language spokesperson:
Richard W. Hartzell
Taipei, Taiwan
tda.taiwan@gmail.com






Taiwan Government Organization Chart